|
planting units were
constructed on site by carefully separating the Halodule and selecting a
minimum of two apical meristems and four short shoots per planting unit.
Planting units were tied to a sod staple and installed 0.5m from the
bird stakes. A total of 219 planting units were installed; however,
after the 30-day contingency monitoring, the “Curved Scar” did not meet
our minimum criteria of 50% survival so additional planting units were
installed.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Time zero monitoring was conducted on 2 May 2005 and Braun-Blanquet
(Braun-Blanquet 1932) scores were recorded at each injury site using a
one meter squared quadrat. Seagrass, macroalgal coverage, and coral
coverage were recorded as follows:

For sites where topographic restoration was necessary, only control
measurements were recorded in the adjacent seagrass flat. For sites
without topographic restoration, measurements were recorded both inside
(berm, scar) of the injury as well as in the adjacent seagrass flat
(control). All quadrat measurements were randomly selected to ensure
representative coverage of the vegetative components within the injury
features and in the control. No control measurements were recorded at
the stake arrays due to their location adjacent to deep channels or
their proximity to other restoration sites.
From this data, seagrass density was calculated and converted into
percent vegetative coverage. The overall restoration goal for damaged
areas and scars is 50% vegetative cover by Year 3. For comparison
purposes, the percent vegetative coverage for the six background sites
ranged from 0.00% - 57.50%, with an average of 8.54%.
The Year 1 monitoring was conducted on 1 May 2006. Braun-Blanquet
scores were recorded at each injury site using the same methodology as
the time zero monitoring. From this data density was calculated and
converted into percent vegetative coverage. Table 1 illustrates the
comparison of the percent coverage at the six sites between the Time
Zero monitoring and the Year 1 monitoring.
Percent coverage of Halodule increased at each site within the
restoration area except for the “T-Array” which experienced no change.
At the “Curved Scar,” most of the original planting units of Halodule
were no longer
|
present, although
there was an increase of 1.00% in percent vegetative cover of Halodule.
Numerous holes were observed in the fill material created by infaunal
organisms including fish and crabs. Several blennies (Parablennius
marmoreus) were observed in
the vicinity of the holes during the monitoring. As a result,
bioturbation is suspected to be the main cause of the loss of the
Halodule planting units at this site. Observations of bioturbation by
rays (Dasyatis and Rhinoptera spp.) on planting unit loss was documented
by Durako et al. (1997), and grazing by sea urchins (Lytechinus
variegates) was documented in healthy seagrass beds by Peterson et al.
(2002).
Percent coverage
of Halodule increased at the “Stake Array” by 1.00%, at the “Power Cat”
by 3.12%, at “Robbie’s Flat” by 5.75%, and at the “Princess Jullin” site
by 11.87%. At the “Princess Jullin” site Halodule was present where
planting units were installed, but recruitment from the surrounding
seagrass flat made it difficult to distinguish original planting units
from those that had spread via rhizome growth from the surrounding
seagrass flat. Percent coverage of turtle grass (Thalassia
testudinum) also increased
at “Robbie’s Flat” by 5.00% and at the “Princess Jullin” site by 5.87%.
As a result of
inspections at the restoration sites which yielded areas with greater
than 50% vegetative coverage, 13 bird stakes were removed from the
“Princess Jullin” site and 64 were removed from “Robbie’s Flat” stake
array in March 2006. After conducting Year 1 monitoring, observations
indicated that the density of seagrass and macroalgae coverage in
specific areas of these sites (greater than 50%) was such that a scar
was no longer
|
visible and that
the density of the seagrass was great enough overall that the presence
of the bird stakes would begin to cause detrimental effects;
particularly in areas were turtle grass was the dominant species.
Therefore, in June 2006, additional bird stakes were removed from all
but the “Curved Scar” and of the 732 that were installed in 2005, only
487 bird stakes remain.
Year 2 monitoring
of our restoration will be conducted in May 2007.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Pat Wells and Melba Nezbed, former and current
park managers at Lignumvitae Key Botanical State Park and George Jones,
Florida Park Service District 5 Bureau Chief for their continual
support, encouragement and persistence regarding seagrass protection and
restoration. We would also like to thank Assistant Park Manager Bob Rose
and Park Rangers John Henry Rieder and Lance Romance for providing
assistance in the field. And Jeanette Hobbs, manager of the Keys
Environmental Restoration Trust Fund for funding part of this
restoration project.
1Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Park Service,
Lignumvitae Key Botanical State Park, P.O. Box 1052, Islamorada, Florida
33036, USA
2Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Park Service, District 5
Administration, 13798 S.E. Federal Highway, Hobe Sound, Florida, 33455,
USA
3Florida Atlantic University, Wilkes Honor College, 5353 Parkside Drive,
Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
janice.duquesnel@dep.state.fl.us
LITERATURE CITED Removed
for space; contact author for citations.
|
|